Quote:
Originally Posted by Lutiferre
I certainly dont have any problems with any specific group, but I was just curious as to who you see as responsible and serious. I mean, how you determine it, and one way to determine that is by not electing people that diverge too much from the general trends
|
Divergences and responsible thinking and acting are two different things.
I don't mind if you have an idea of Europe different to mine. Which is what I imagine a part of what you were getting at. So if you believe in some sort of homogeneized Europe where ethnic preservation and national sovereignty are secondary, my disagreement with you is not such that I should consider you a foe, for the time being. Nor a friend, for that matter.
But you have to realize that, as with everything in life, there are hierarchical orders and priorities. I wouldn't dream of telling you how you must put your house in order. And certainly I'm not going to admit that you tell me how to do it with mine.
Those are the basics. From that point on, we can discuss the terms upon which Europe should be built. And we would do it with the confidence that we would be building up from right and solid foundations.
This is an idea of Europeanism much different to the construction of a super-state, to the image of the United States of America. Which should not be called Europeanism but Pan-Europeanism.
In Europe, ethnic preservation and national sovereignty does not equal to less Europe. It equals Europe. No more and no less.
Quote:
|
and therefore would less likely be subject to moderation seeing as the trends also apply to the admins. (which would disqualify me)
|
You are very wrong if you believe that my intention is to marginalize you. On the contrary, my intention, if any, would be to see at which point we can meet within the limits of what's reasonable and realistic, and converge; so that you can be accommodated in the project without this being a source for conflicts.
And where say you I mean others as well. Like, for example, Der.