Quote:
Originally Posted by Mynydd
Oh, come on! If Hamiton had been white and had a big nose, they would have used fake big noses. Or if he had big ears like Prince Charles, they would have used dumbo ears. And no one would have called it racism.
|
I agree with you. They are just emphasizing an INDIVIDUAL trait. Now if they put gorilla-masks on, then yes I would say that there is some racism there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mynydd
So everyone can be characterized for what he is different, but if he is Black then it is racism?
|
It is, believe me.
I'm even sure that if that Hamilton was an Amerindian, an Asian or an Australian aborigine there would not had made all that mess.
It seems to me that blacks have became the favourite teddy bear of politicians (after the jews, of course
) and every time it comes about an Afroe / Black individual (and about the individual himself, with no reference to the blacks) and to anything related to blacks and even to afro-centrism you'll be hardly attacked
My self I've been labelled as "racist", "close-minded", "Intolerant", "Ignorant", "biggot", "Neo-Nazi", "fascist", "Grand-son of Nazies refugiated in Argentina" aetc aetc aetc just for refuting afro-centrism, for saying that almost every Afro-centrist claim was based on lousy speculations and on the fact that "as africans had oral traditions and no written documents it was easy to whites and other peoples to steal their far advanced knowledges " and for refuting the "black inventions" myths spreaded during the US Black History month.
Moreover, every afro-centrist sympathiser (which are not always and necessarely blacks) systematically refutes your arguments saying that "you are being racist", "you surelly pick up those argument form a KKK website" and without listening what you have to say. It seems that the deal is just to believe their word as it comes.