Re: National Service?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marulus
I think that the essence of this thread was that most of us were speaking theoretically, about whether, on condition that our countries were ruled by real nationalist regimes and not the current traitorous ones, it would be good to reinstate the national service, as a means of fostering cohesion of the nation.
I agree that in current situation army means going to "defend your country" ... in Iraq and Afghanistan, as auxiliaries of the Yankees.
|
As I understood it it was talking about now and not about "what if" scenarios.
Anyway IF there was a nationalist regime (I don't like that kind of debates since I rather deal with problems of today than dream about a perfect state) I would promote army, but not force it.
__________________
"The two-party-system and the artificial division between left and right is especially malign because it confines people into mental prisons, from which they are almost not able to get out. Even in a one-party-system it is mentally easier to be "in the opposition", "against the system". In the two-party-system (which is in fact one-party-system as well), on the other hand, if the left is currently in the office and you are opposed to the system, it is automatically assumed that you are a "rightist", ie. supporter of the party of the right. And vice versa. Most people refuse to see that the two major parties are in fact one and the same party. Thus the liberal democracy, especially in its venomous two-party variety, is the most successful system of totalitarian manipulation ever invented. Each of the two parties usually has a very dedicated voting herd, needless to say."
- "Marcus Marulus", Stirpes forum member
|