Re: Meta-ethnicity?
I didn't have time yet to read the whole 3 pages of the thread, so I'll adress the original question only and maybe later I'll respond to some other points.
To me "meta-ethnicities" have no meaning, especialy this Romance, Germanic, Slavic etc BS which is based on linguistics only. It has nothing to do with ethnic identity only with language.
What I would consider as my meta-ethnicity is being Catholic European, because I have some cultural and historical bond with other Catholic European nations in some broad definition (much more than let's say with Russians or Ukranians even though we're 'officialy' in same 'meta-ethnicity'). But of course as I said before I don't give much importance to meta-ethnicity.
__________________
"The two-party-system and the artificial division between left and right is especially malign because it confines people into mental prisons, from which they are almost not able to get out. Even in a one-party-system it is mentally easier to be "in the opposition", "against the system". In the two-party-system (which is in fact one-party-system as well), on the other hand, if the left is currently in the office and you are opposed to the system, it is automatically assumed that you are a "rightist", ie. supporter of the party of the right. And vice versa. Most people refuse to see that the two major parties are in fact one and the same party. Thus the liberal democracy, especially in its venomous two-party variety, is the most successful system of totalitarian manipulation ever invented. Each of the two parties usually has a very dedicated voting herd, needless to say."
- "Marcus Marulus", Stirpes forum member
|