[Lutiferre]

Originally Posted by Seekers

Lutiferre, I read what you replied to me, and your case is one long argumentum ad populum. I will not take the yes-it-is-no-it-isn't trip to neverland with you. Therefore, my reply is very brief.

Then you clearly didnt understand what I said, or you just have entirely misunderstood the principle of argumentum ad populum. Argumentum ad populum involves proposing a causal relationship between many people believing A to be true, and proposing strictly therefore A to be true.
I have not done so - I have simply taken into consideration the identity aspect involved with ethnicity - identity being the main connecting property of any ethnicity. From that, I made the distinction between an intellectual establishment of "Germanic" or other meta-ethnicities validity, and the identification on a societal basis with a broader meta-ethnicity. Nevertheless, you didnt understand my point, and I have already perfectly elaborated it.

Originally Posted by Seekers

I find it strange that you accuse me of taking what you say to mean something, "literally" as you say. If you don't mean what you say, there's no way that I'm going to get your message.

Because you took the exact number 95% literally, as if you thought I had statistical evidence to back it up. Which is socially handicapped on your behalf. (no offense)

Originally Posted by Seekers

I also find it quite appalling that you are such a sucker for the EU, and that you have such blind trust that Denmark is going the right way.

I think the EU is under bad leadership, and dont agree with the way it is now. Nevertheless, all this is unrelated to this threads topic of discussion.