Quote:
Originally Posted by Mynydd
We are talking of Europe, not of any individual nation. And as it happens, I do not share any views of any racial connection throughout the entire spectrum of Europe strong and homogenous enough to make a case for any European structure, or pre-structure.
Such views are derivatives in the realm of what being very generous I will call aryanology (a more appropriate name would be aryanomania).
|
Inside of Europe we see just the repetition of the basic 6-race type-scheme (Nordid, Cromagnoid, Mediterranid, Dinarid, Alpinoid, Osteuropid) - the main variation between nations is about percentages but there are always overlaps and only certain regions and more distant areas-people are more different.
This is true for the racial specialisation, genetically we can deal with similarities as well, with just the extremes clustering more closely-distantly and relative to non-European people like Ashkenazic Jews (even though they have signicant European admixture!) the case is even more clear.
Compare with this study about Euro-American and Jewish clusters on Dienekes blog:
Dienekes\' Anthropology Blog
Dienekes\' Anthropology Blog: Genetic structure of European Americans
Dienekes\' Anthropology Blog: Genetic structure of European Americans
Europeans have primarily a gradient from North-North Western (Cluster 1: SWE, GB, PL) to South Eastern Europe (Cluster 2: GRE, IT), with Iberia (Spain) being in between with this being primarily the result of the varying Neolithic input I guess. But as a whole Europeans form a cluster on their own with non-Europeans staying largely outside - Jews f.e. have only single individuals in the spectrum but cluster overall independently (Cluster 3) and clearly outside of the European spectrum.
123.jpg (image)
Culture is a tool for individuals and biological units of higher lifeforms and humans in particular. A culture working against the needs and benefit of the people and group it should serve should be corrected or abandoned.
Europeans were closer to a optimum than any other people and still have a great potential not just racially, but also culturally, there is just the need for some corrections.
The Indoeuropean cultural fundament and occidental spirit together with the racial make up is what being European is or should be about.
Being Nordid, Alpinid or Mediterranid alone doesnt make one European alone, but it makes a bloodline at least integrable by race because it fulfils the first precondition. One who doesnt fulfil the first precondition is excluded automatically with exception of very exceptional individuals of greatest value probably.
Or do you think a Sudanese is closer to a Spaniard than a Swede or Greek?
Its all about distance, both between individuals as well as groups on the one hand and qualitative differences, different developmental levels on the other. Obviously you could say a Russian is not like my Spaniards, but a Russian is closer than a Sudanese or Wedda and its also more rational to support the first, as long as they are no concrete threat for your ethnocultural regional group, than the latter, because of the common heritage in many aspects - even if there are differences as well.
Inside of Spain you can distinguish different racial types, ethnic formations and regions as well, so again its very relative, depends on with whom you are comparing. Things are in nature as well as if its about humans in general always hierarchic.
Your brother is closer to you than your cousin, but your cousin closer than...
I think you got what I mean. From a certain point of development and in certain situations your cousin is as good as your brother because your whole family might be at stake and to still debate who's closer will just help the enemies of your family to wipe out all of you.
In the end I'm ready to work with everyone together for reaching a good goal. To name an example, in real policy its better to have an Indian president of a former colony than a European corrupt subject which sells out his own people and mankind the same time to the high finance, plutocratic oligarchy. If a corrupted cousin works against the family, but a foreigner does something good for it, the cousin will be punished and the foreigner awarded. That doesnt make him a family member though, not even one of the second line, whereas the relative of the treacherous cousin is still a preferable individual member of the family.