Quote:
Originally Posted by Aptrgangr
The agents within NPD already are doing a good job, one MP started Sieg Heiling in public, police suddenly found child porn on a computer of another MP...this system is creative in it's methods to fight the only political opposition, isn't it?
|
That's the problem to which I was referring.
The system? It is undeniable that the system infiltrates its own elements to prevent any nationalist alternative from making any advances, by burdening it with ideas and events that belonged to a very particular period of history and which are much past today.
But a bit of self-critique wouldn't do any harm. If something, it should do much good.
There are enough elements that are not of the system, and that do not even need the influence of any system agents, which do exactly what the system expects us to do. I can easily imagine how any office department in charge of preventing the advance of nationalism, in any country, its officers spend most of the day among drinks in the bar because so much of their work is already done by inside elements, without these offices even need to hint them.
One of the many examples, would be this
German rightist jailed for Hitler salute
former Baader-Meinhof founder member, and later NPD legal representative.
Rather than focusing on whether he is a system agent or an irresponsible element, I would focus on the question of why the probability of such things happening is not dealt with effectively by the party hierarchy for a start. Only then you can focus on how to deal with outside infiltration.
In Spain, Democracia Nacional (DN) not only has not stood by its purposed
autonomía histórica (historical autonomy), but it has also imported historical elements which are not even Spanish and they are more burdening than our own. And I'm not pointing to the worse case. DN is nothing if you compare it to e.g. Alianza Nacional (AN), who they go to such lengths as to give a high priority to foreign, alien burdens (in other words, they are mix of nazi and WN).
And I wonder, if I am a Nationalist and I don't stand any near to those, why should I be stigmatized by them? And, like me, so many others who are or who would be, but who refuse to be marked with that stigma. Understandibly so.