[Menydh]

Originally Posted by lunulae

regarding "why scientists don't believe in ethnicity", i thought it was scientifically demonstrated that humans are split up into subraces etcetera.
why would they have no interest in preserving these races and the manifold of homo sapiens sapiens?

I suppose that the study of any life fact should entail an interest for its preservation as well as for its dissectioning, or even its transformation. It should not surprise you that human nature is seen as a test lab for some scientists. Especially for so-called social scientists, but not just. It was also like this with III Reich scientists. Only the directions seem to change between ones and the others.

i eventually found out that two scientists that actually agree on the same scientific theories, have two different political orientations. matt ridley is a libertarian and richard dawkins is a social democrat (and/or secular humanist), eventhough they both agree on a gene-centered view of evolution.

There surely are others.

many people also ask me why we need nation states. it seems to be a very easy question to answer, but i don't think it is. on the other hand, if we reject nation states, then we must automatically favour globalism (which is very dystopic, if you ask me).

Nation-states are part of the evolutive social structure of human beings...in Europe. Up from more primitive structures like the tribe. They are also an extended concept of the primigenial family structure, therefore a part of the natural order of human social interaction.

This means that whatever alternative option is forced upon us, no matter the name that they wish to give it, the dismantling and ultimate destruction of the natural social structures of a people or peoples results in chaos.