[Marcus Marulus]

First of all, my thanks to Kurnewal for posting this article, because he showed us once again how incompatible the so-called White/WASP "Nationalism" is with the basic feelings and aspirations of the most European nations and how it is entirely incompatible with the struggle for preservation of the distinct European peoples.

The author basically says, in nice words, that all European national identities need to be dumped to the garbage can, in the name of some non-existing "White Nation." And he says it explicitly, therefore I thank him for his sincerity.

In the first part of the article he - correctly - points at the globalist ideologies that have contributed to the erosion of distinct nations and their identities, in the name of the "god" money. Yet in the second part of the article he advocates precisely the same thing that he in the first part condemned: he proposes that all distinct national allegiances of the "White" nations should be forsaken and that a new nation should be formed, a "White Nation." That would surely entail loss of national identities and individualities, terrible cultural homologation, alienation and uprooting of the European people from their origins. Which language would that new "nation" speak? Probably, you-know-which. This is multiculturalism in the rawest sense of word...

There would not be any Irish, or Swedes or French any more, Europeans would just turn into some inarticulate mass of euro-whiteys or euro-gringos. It is obvious that he has the American model before his eyes, the model of amalgamation of different ethnicities into one new nation, the distinct characteristic of which is solely the skin pigmentation (it is not even the language, because American Blacks and Asiatics speak English as well as "Whites" do).

This article is interesting maybe only for America, but not for Europe. Considering their racialism, one could maybe take the same stand as that on Islam. As we use to say that we have nothing against Islam in its own lands, a European nationalist could also say that he does not mind the American "White Nationalism" and raci(ali)sm, as long as it is applied only to America. "Whiteness" is a powerul societal construct there, they tend to define themselves by that concept. It has been in their traditions for centuries. If they want to stick to it, why not? If they want a racial separation, why not? It becomes problem when they want to infect Europe with their agenda. And it seems to me that the attempts to force "Whiteness" upon Europe is also part of the globalist scheme, just as multiracialism is. It is an attempt to win "hearts and minds" of healthy European nationalists for America, some allegedly better America, which hasn't yet been contaminated with multiracialism. But these are only two faces of the same thing.

Their ramblings about "superiority" are also sickening and nauseating. Superiority of what? If someone has an urge to proclaim his superiority all too often and too vulgarly, it may be most probably the sign of exactly the opposite, of some deeply seated insecurity and fear. (It must be, however, noted that not all American racialists are necessarily supremacists. There are some rare exceptions, like that of Michael Hoffman II.)

Accepting the skin-pigmentation-worship instead of existing traditions would mean to fall to the lowest possible level of baseness. It would really mean a terrible cultural regression.