Quote:
Originally Posted by Aptrgangr
Egalitarianism is one reason why we are in this mess today.
I never said they are subhumans, I just do not associate myself with them.
I would not exclude biologists here. Biological differences can not be explained by sociologists and historians only.
I consider them as differnt species since I have the freedom to choose the mammals want to associate myself; scientifically they are of a different race.
When they are this good and can do the same jobs as we do, why do they come here in masses then instead of building up their own countries?
Inheriting a certain genetical compostion does not automatically make sure one's cultureal achievements are honoured and maintained. In Europe the very opposite is the case, those having achieved the highest technological achievements are those who destroy their own race, heritage and culture. One cannot say the liberal-democracies are subcomlex constructs, they are highly sophisticated and thus this devastating.
And like all civilizations these liberal-democracies will come to an end too.
I never said negroes were not capable to study and graduate, but most of them are not - here most could, but do not because they are degenerated.
|
OK, so I guess I had misunderstood you
But this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aptrgangr
So when they are the same - what is wrong when they come here and interbreed then?
Why are you bothered by the chaninging genetical composition of your country then?
|
Do I have to repeat it for hundredth time like a broken record?
The biological composition of the nation, as all other attributes of the nation (culture etc.), is something worth preserving, worth in its own merit, I don't feel any need to posit it in terms of superiority/inferiority.
I never said they are "the same", I said
equal in purely theoretical, metaphysical terms, as being human, although belonging to another race. I didn't mean equality in rights, in this worldly purely materialistic categories (I am generally suspicious towards the very notion of
rights, not only in this case).
Let me explain it with this parable:
Let's suppose you think of some other man as possessing the same basic humanity like you. You recognize that as a fact. Let's suppose he's German. Does it, however, mean that you would let that man into your house and allow him to do there whatever he wants, for example, to break your dishes or ruin your furniture? You probably wouldn't, I suppose. But does the fact that you would never let him do that, mean that you necessarily think that he has lesser human dignity, that he is not the same in the virtue of being human?