[Menydh]

Originally Posted by Milesian

The initial post is teeming with errors, inaccuracies and fallacies.

I would say more of the latter.

Tennyson has taken the information from wikipedia (see the source of the image and also check Saint Maurice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), and where he says:

Originally Posted by Tennyson

Already in Medieval times the Church elevated Negroes to sainthood.

He hides (by means of not mentioning) that:

Originally Posted by wikipedia

Sometimes St. Maurice is represented as a black Moor. However, Jean Devisse points out that it was not until 1240 that St. Maurice appears as a black man. Prior to that, he had been depicted as a white man.[5][6] Because of this discrepancy, Maurice is depicted as possessing characteristics of different ethnic groups, depending on when a given image was produced. The images of Saint Maurice at the Cathedral of Magdeburg are images in which Maurice is depicted as a black man.

That is to say that he was elevated to the altars a few hundred years before even being depited as a Black man.

What little is know of St. Maurice is that he was a Coptic Egyptian. I wonder why then Tennyson does not accuse of the same to Protestants for venerating a Middle Eastern Anatolian, such as was St. Nicholas (aka Santa Klaus: Saint Nicholas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

Originally Posted by Tennyson

Today, the Catholic Church is a major force pushing for open borders.

Except for those of us who reject such things as ecumenism (with the exception of an approach of the Eastern and Western Churches), as multiculturalism.

I refuse to get identified with sects who use the fallacy and the defamation as a model of proselitism.

It will take time to address them all but I will make a point of doings so over the weekend.

I'll look forward to what Plethon and you have to say in the matter.