[Marcus Marulus]

Originally Posted by alyster

Terrorist organisation, which are dengerous to us, are more of the global once. ... We could name some terror organisations which operate only in West, like Aryan Nations for one. Or GRAPO, FNE the list can go on. They are much less of a threat because we can monitor them better, disarm them better and so on. With out having support from Afgan government we would be cut off to do anything about threats from there. And with organisations like Al-Qaeda we clearly have failed. Recents attacks in London have show that they still can carry out attacks. The fact that they mostly failed this time is pure luck. So to disarm these groups we have to go to their homes, disable their training facilities(yes military camps), disable their funding, disable their communications and lock up the mastermind behind it. It's like dealing with mafia, we must get all the way to the top of it, or the problem won't be solved. We can close down as many cells in Europe as we can, however there will be more. And some day one of them will succeed again. Also if some sort of a regime give shelter to the ones attacking us, it is as good as if they themselves would attack us. Had Taliban just mailed Osama to the US, they'd still be in power, wouldn't they? They would be even better off with greatful US aiding them.

Who are the "we" you keep referring to relentlessly, I wonder?