Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zrinski
Hrvatski znanstvenici koji su istrazivali Y-kromosome dosli su do zakljucka kako je I haplotp na ovim prostorima autothtoni haplotip i da se sirio prema sjeveru, a ne obrnuto kako se dosada mislilo. Svi strani geneticari koji se bave ovakvim istrazivanjem se slazu u potpunosti.
Naravno nositelji I haplotipa ne moraju biti Dinaridske fizionomije, ali valjda se slazes da su ocito glavni nositelj i dan danas velikom vecinom I haplotipvi Dinarske fizionomije.  |
My reply to a similar postulation (copied from Sk@di)
In "Dinaric Modal Haplogroup" the designation Dinaric is geographic.
The percentages are way too low or even absent in places like Switzerland, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands and France (even Turkey), where this type is common. It can surely be associated with Slavic (as well as pre-Slavic) migrations, but not any physical type.
Take a look at this link:
http://forum.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=9335
It is strange how this haplogroup predominates in Slavic nations. Anyway, this all indicates that the racial types we're talking about are not sub-races but phenotypes, which are, as we have seen from the recend debrachycephalisation trend in Europe, even pretty fluid.
I wouldn't go so far as to declare that Slavic Dinarids beong to I1b but rather the type after the LGM that inhabited the Balkans at that time, which certainly wasn't exclusively Dinarid (and certainly not in the modern sense). However, if that is (at least partly) the case, we have solved the riddle of the origins of Dinarids.
http://www.familytreedna.com/pdf/DNA...oupISpread.pdf
Or were you referring to another study?