View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Saturday, January 22nd, 2005
Dr. Solar Wolff Dr. Solar Wolff is offline
Inactive Member
 
Last Online: Monday, May 1st, 2006 07:15
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: California
Posts: 476
Dr. Solar Wolff 's opinion is sought out by learned men.Dr. Solar Wolff 's opinion is sought out by learned men.Dr. Solar Wolff 's opinion is sought out by learned men.
Default Re: The Celts : a comparative analysis

Bone evidence indicates that the Kelts (Celts) were Nordic with light body builds and receeding foreheads with the nose in-line with the forehead. This profile fits a lot of us, I know, and the Kelts were a major player in Europe.

The central Kelts got rolling about 1000 B.C. in the area of Austria, Switzerland, Southern Germany. Later they expanded into France, Germany, Spain, Portugal. Later into the Low Countries and Britain, Ireland. Meanwhile, back in Austria, some of the more restless Kelts (Le Tene Culture) under a warlord, ventured north, east and finally west into Sweden. This brought the cult of Odin to that part of the world and it is argued that this warlord WAS Odin. This was about 500 B.C., the Golden Age of Greece. About 1000 years later, 500 B.C., these same people underwent a huge population explosion and migreated into Europe as the Germans in various tribes.

My point is that the difference between Kelt and German is chronology more than race. The Germans washed over the Kelts in Germany, Switzerland, France and Britain without ever realizing that they were "cousins" only seperated by time, distance and only lastly by genes.
Reply With Quote