[Waarnemer]

Yes, there have been many notable scientists, thiests and athiests, who have not been impressed by Darwin's theory.

there is no credibility in a point of view in which people try to refute a fact simply because it conflicts with own interests, unscientific. ok, its debatable what could be considered as notable and what the point is, either way jerry bergman is far from notable or it would be as infamous. also you keep referring to darwins theory giving an impression that evolution would equal darwins findings. i don't know if you do that on purpose though, thought i should mention it.

darwin isn't above question nor criticism like you say, his findings are empirical so that would be a contradiction. what is above question and criticism among christians is religion, even if god would exist you wouldn't dare to question him so it would be an idea to stop reflection own faulty upon evolution

now i doubt there is even one single scientist alive today who would question microevolution, its very hard to question something which can be observed with the naked eye, and that brings us to macroevolution, although the evidence is utterly overwhelming its an 'easy' target for people like you yourself, but if something contradicts with your believes and its being proved, its up to you to reflect and over think your own ideas