Re: freedom and political structures
The Indo-European peoples have been enslaved by the mass media, not necessarily by democracy itself. For example, Sweden was a
quite nice nation before the multiculturalism was established. The State practised negative eugenics, had a very strong defence, welfare and we also had a research institution for racial biology. We had politician and leaders, which still, at least to a certain level, wanted to represent the true interests of the Swedish people. The relationship between the State and its people must be mutual. That’s the thing. A homogenous people have the ability to create prosperous societies – almost regardless of political system. But some are, of course, more effective and advantageous. Democracy is, on the other hand, an ineffective system, non-authoritarian, expensive and it also disrupt the people. It’s the system, where the majority always oppresses the minority. Therefore, I’m an Anti-Democrat. But the modern society is not a democracy, at least not here in Sweden.
Last edited by Antikrist; Sunday, April 15th, 2007 at 02:28.
|