Quote:
Originally Posted by Breogan
Well, modern nowaday states are serving Jews very well.
I think rejection to states is referring to states we have today, and not every state; in this case it would be anarchism without "nacional" or further considerations.
BTW putting this post doesn't mean I share nacional-anarchism position, just promoting debate and nothing else. What I don't want is today states obviously.
|
I'm glad you posted this article, it is good to see as many of these ideas as possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Breogan
I think you're confusing with "right-wing" anarchism or, simply, liberalism: letting capitalism to take total control without state intervention in economic trends and so on. But this is again the contrary that nacional-anarchism claims to defend: a nation-state based on racial and cultural impplications; both capitalism ("right-wing") and socialism ("left-wing") are the opposite.
And contrary to NS without hierarchies and other "state vices".
Other thing is that this could be possible of course.
|
I was thinking of the United States society more than its economic system. Compared to Europe it is a sea of 300 million individuals and small groups who offer little resistance to any well organized outsider. That's why a nationalism built on strong social, religious and co-operative economic groups and an effective state is much safer. It is far harder to divide and conquer.