View Single Post
  #52 (permalink)     Quote this post in a PM
Old Monday, April 9th, 2007
M.R.'s Avatar
M.R. M.R. is online now
Madman
 
Last Online: 1 Minute Ago 12:30
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,680
M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.M.R. 's judgement is sought by kings.
Default Re: Northern Ireland Unionist Leader Meets With Prime Minister of Ireland

Quote:
Originally Posted by Octillion View Post
You asked that because gypsies had settled in Slovenia in the 16th century, did they have the right to consider Slovenia as their homeland and I said yes. Why not? Here I disagree.
Because Slovenia is a homeland only for Slovenians. Others are foreigners.

Quote:
Ulster Protestants are ethnically British and
What is 'ethnically British'? There is no British ethnicity.

Quote:
have formed a separate and cohesive community in Ireland and separate and cohesive national identity for almost 400 years. Ulster to Ulster Protestants has more in common with Scotland and England than it does with the rest of Ireland.
So what? Europeans settled in America some time ago, and even consider themselves a "nation", but can they rightfully say America is their homeland? Of course not.

Quote:
They see Ulster as separate country to the rest of Ireland and they regard Ulster their homeland.
That's how they see it, yes.

OK, I've seen the edit.

Quote:
But if you are going to condemn those lands where the natives were dispossessed at the hands of the settlers to start new countries, then you ought to, by this logic, condemn the United States, Canada, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, all of Latin America, Taiwan, Okinawa, and several others.
Yes I would and I do. So what?

BTW do you support Israeli occupation of Palestine?
__________________
"The two-party-system and the artificial division between left and right is especially malign because it confines people into mental prisons, from which they are almost not able to get out. Even in a one-party-system it is mentally easier to be "in the opposition", "against the system". In the two-party-system (which is in fact one-party-system as well), on the other hand, if the left is currently in the office and you are opposed to the system, it is automatically assumed that you are a "rightist", ie. supporter of the party of the right. And vice versa. Most people refuse to see that the two major parties are in fact one and the same party. Thus the liberal democracy, especially in its venomous two-party variety, is the most successful system of totalitarian manipulation ever invented. Each of the two parties usually has a very dedicated voting herd, needless to say."

- "Marcus Marulus", Stirpes forum member
Reply With Quote